Saturday, June 27, 2015

Culture

Last night I was sitting at the kitchen table eating ice cream with my family and I began a conversation with my dad about technology.  My dad is a computer hardware engineer and knows quite a bit about technology and creating soundboards and all sorts of stuff that I don’t understand, but it took him a good 3 months to figure out how to sufficiently text on his Galaxy 5S. He is one that tends to glorify the “good ol’ days” and looks fondly back on the times before all of his children were constantly plugged in. On Father’s Day, my dad was frustrated because he came into the living room on his special day and six out of six people were looking at six different screens. Laptops, cell phones, tablets, etc. Family time has been demolished, in his opinion, and it because of all these stupid devices! I was a bit nervous to open up this can of worms with my dad because I knew he had strong opinions on the matter, but I wanted to hear him out and understand why he believes the increased technology is bad.

The conversation that followed was insightful. I discussed the articles I’d read for class with him and referenced Digital Nation. We discussed how in Digital Nation they do a test on task switching and what the research is showing. My dad’s greatest concern is that there is an effect on the ability for the future generation to be creative because of all the distractions. He was explaining to me that there is process (obviously I don’t have any research on this because my dad just told me) that when someone is looking to create a new product or idea their brain needs at least 25 minutes to take the idea and piece the WHOLE product together in their mind. When a distraction comes it wipes the slate clean and they are back to rebuilding the full idea. The unanticipated issue is that each time we rebuild the idea in our mind we do it a little differently from the first time around and this is why our final products have more “bugs.” I was fascinated by this point and I believe to some extent it is a valid argument. We also had a deep conversation about the change in culture. I explained to my dad that we (I consider myself a digital native) truly believe that we are more effective when we are switching between tasks. I brought in this idea of a shift in culture, that our brains are learning in different ways and that we don’t even know what it is like any other way. I feel like the strongest point to be made is that this switch in culture, brain activity, and value focus has happened throughout all of history. This is not a new pattern, but it is following the exact pattern that human history has always followed.

Yes. There are human values and culture norms that I think are important to hold onto. I listed my opinion in my word cloud. Technology doesn’t necessarily diminish these values, but it does have an impact on how we define these values. We still value privacy, yet we allow Facebook to be an exception. Technology enables us to spend family time in different ways (skyping across the country, snap chatting with your boyfriend in Colorado, etc.). Technology shifts the way we socialize because it gives us different ways to communicate. We can communicate over broad expanses and reach out to many people at the same time, or we can still have a personal skype call or send a video through Pinterest messaging system. The way I see it is that we have more options on how we choose to communicate with those around us.

If you ask any teacher, they will tell you that technology has affected the culture of student bullying and harassment, but once again, this is not a new thing. Technology is not creating all of these world problems, but it is just transforming the current problems! We are experiencing this transfer of culture primarily in a horizontal direction, but that does not mean this is a bad thing. The bottom line, is that as teacher leaders in a digital age we must take the opportunity to embrace the cultural shift, accept that there will be those who do not want to accept the change, and do our best to diligently teach our students how to be polite citizens in this digital world. We are the leaders of this cultural shift because we are invested. We are involved in the conversation and we can see both sides of the argument. So, we must reach out and strengthen the values of society, yet give technology the “in” that it needs to continue to move progress forward. The shift in culture is not bad, it is just different.

Resources: 
http://video.pbs.org/video/1402987791/

Monday, June 22, 2015

Turning My Thoughts Inside Out

Over the weekend, I was diligently thinking about my homework – and I went saw the Disney Pixar movie Inside Out. I loved this movie! Not only was it a fun-family movie, but it also was interesting to make connections with the brain. At one point in the movie, the “emotions” in the brain are going through the process of taking the days memories and sending them to long term memory, and I turned to my sister and whispered “That’s called the hippocampus!” Obviously, this movie was not anatomically correct, nor did it remotely resemble the functions we know about the brain, but it was enjoyable to make the connections – my favorite part was when they went into the “abstract” thinking part of the brain.

In class we have discussed in depth the different theories behind cognitive development. Vygotsky and Piaget are the primary theorists discussed and although they have different findings, we are able to mesh together and interpret their findings compared to the development of the brain. The brain of a child develops from front to back. With this information we are able to correlate the research done by Vygotsky and Piaget who stated that there is a process / different stages of cognition that builds over time. The brain starts developing motor skills and automatic functions near the beginning of life – which runs parallel to the preoperational, operational, and the concrete operational theory.  The child continues to grow and they are able to understand the abstract more fully, which makes sense because the frontal lobe (which houses these higher order thinking skills) develops at a slower rate. 
During the learning process, neurons attach and create synapses. These neuro-pathways are strengthened as we receive increased exposure and a concept is reiterated when we create multiple pathways to recall the information. Vygotsky’s argument was founded on a social-constructivist theory, meaning that we take the information from our environment, culture, and dialogue and internalize that information until it becomes our very way of thinking. In my reflection, I’ve thought about how this shows that as we are interacting with our environment it is building multiple pathways through the maze of neurons in our brain.

The brain is always changing, and with those changes we are able to adapt to the circumstances around us. The influx in technology has, indeed, changed our brains, yet that does not necessarily mean it is destroying our brain. Children that are being raised as digital natives may have different problem solving skills, they may be able to think of concepts more abstractly due to the problem solving used during video games. Digital natives have created connections across many topics because of the quick access to multiple types of information. Digital natives are confronted with so much information that often they do not make strong synaptic connections in all these topics, but they still have many interconnected neuropaths to varying subjects. If I had to draw a picture of the world wide web, I would depict it as a massive connection of neurons and neuropathways! We are so connected! Our brain adapts to the media and we literally are retraining the way we think.

In conclusion, it is possible that we are seeing not a gradual adaptation, but actual evolution over the course of one generation. Our brains are changing and it is affecting the way children learn. So, the question is, how can we use the media that is in our classrooms to best utilize these new brain development patterns to maximize cognition? I don’t yet have an answer for that, but I’m hoping to have a greater grasp by the time I complete my Master’s program!

Sources:


Wednesday, June 17, 2015

First Attempt at a V-log!


I decided to create a vlog and reflect on what I'd learned in class by teaching it to someone else. I spent a lot of time today reviewing the genes to cognition website  in order to understand enough about the structure of the brain so that I could explain it effectively to a four year-old. I'm including the embedded video, but if that doesn't work the youtube link is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdpes4o3nGg

Monday, June 15, 2015

Confessions of a "Heavy Media User"

I was really nervous about tracking my usage of media for two full days. I knew I was a heavy media user and for some reason “heavy media user” has such a poor connotation to it! I automatically associate it with large, fat, and lazy. I knew that I used my phone a lot and the computer is an all day/everyday thing for me at work while I take loan applications. So, I downloaded the app Track Phone Usage as well as Checky to help me stay honest in my media tracking.

As I was compiling my data and creating my infographic, I was ultimately not surprised by my media usage. I text my out-of-state boyfriend a lot, and last month, my cell phone statement showed a total of almost 12,000 texts from my phone in one month. Obviously the texting is the bulk of my media usage and it benefits me because I am able to have contact with one of the most important people in my life. On the other hand, I found myself making excuses to stay home and not go out so that I could stay home and text without “life activity” interrupting me. I’ve been very aware of this for the last several months, and often I fall into the tech-trap, but I am very purposeful to go out and experience life activities and leave my phone behind.

I was surprised that my media usage does not vary from weekends/week days. I anticipated that I would use media more frequently on the weekends, but other than the texting increased there was not much change between the days. According the Kaiser Family Foundation article that we reviewed in class, it appears that in relation to other teenagers I am considered a heavy media user. I honestly, don’t know if I would deem this a fair comparison because although I do stare at the screen all day for work, this is working/active media time and I don’t believe most 8-18 year olds are paid to work on the computer nine hours a day. If it wasn’t a part of my job – there is no way I would be on the computer that much! My Friday and Saturday work schedule is very similar, so I tracked my Sunday media usage too and I touched the computer for only 2 minutes simply so I could restart it.

Active:
Computer, texting, Snapchat, and reading books
Passive:
Music, Pinterest, Facebook, and Snapchat.

In conclusion, I was grateful for this assignment because it helped me recognize my feelings while I’m using different types of media. When I’m texting my boyfriend I swing from happy, sad, ecstatic, in love, frustrated, excited, anxious, amazed and all those other feelings found in a relationship! A technologically based relationship is not ideal and I don’t prefer all of these emotions to be shared over texting and Snapchat, but I am grateful that the technology does exist so that I can communicate with someone I love so instantaneously. Facebook and Pinterest leave me feeling like a lazy lard! I don’t like how I feel after wasting time on websites such as these. Music pumps me up. I listen while I’m walking, working, reading, driving and studying. I know that I study better when I’m not listening to music, but it is better than all the background noise of the call center environment I work in currently. Using the computer leaves me feeling drained! I’m so excited for the day when I get to be teaching and not stuck behind my computer all day! Oddly, reading a book did not leave me uplifted, but this may be due to the content (research methods textbook). When I was laying in the bathtub on Sunday morning reading Harry Potter, I was left relaxed and happy as my mind raced through the air alongside Harry and his broomstick.
Data
Friday
Saturday
Computer
9:45:00
7:30
Phone: Total
4:29:12
5:31:30
Texting
2:49:26
3:14:05
Pandora
2:35:00
1:45:00
Pinterest
0:16:38
0:09:57
Facebook
0:12:23
0:16:18
Snap Chat
0:20:42
0:36:53
TV
0:00:00
0:00:00
Books
0:20:00
0:40:00